Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. logo SBH - Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Hold DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
0
BUY 9
HOLD 17
SELL 4
STRONG
SELL
0
| PRICE TARGET: $16.17 DETAILS
HIGH: $20.00
LOW: $13.00
MEDIAN: $16.00
CONSENSUS: $16.17
DOWNSIDE: 2.74%
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Stable Earnings Power

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

B- 63.6 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for stable earnings power businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 20%
C+ 58.9
  • 5yr Avg ROIC 12.0% 70/100
  • Operating Margin Trend -0.51 pp/yr 33/100
Contributes 11.8 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
A+ 95.5
  • 5yr Avg ROE 46.7% 100/100
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR -2.0% 87/100
Contributes 14.3 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 15%
C- 46.9
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR 1.0% 29/100
  • 5yr EPS CAGR 13.8% 86/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 1/5 20/100
Contributes 7.0 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 15%
B- 64.6
  • 5yr FCF Margin 4.5% 47/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion 0.86x 86/100
Contributes 9.7 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 20%
C+ 57.7
  • Net Debt / EBITDA 3.31x 44/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 5.09x 65/100
  • Altman Z-Score 2.87 73/100
Contributes 11.5 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 15%
B- 62.2
  • EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.22 68/100
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 4/5 20/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 8 89/100
Contributes 9.3 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Dumping

2 of 3 gurus held; 1 added; 1 trimmed; 3 full exits.

Holders
2 -1
Avg Δ position
-16.0%
New buys
0
Full exits
3
As of Q2 2026
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (20%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (15%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, 5yr EPS CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (15%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (20%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (15%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.