Regional Management Corp. logo RM - Regional Management Corp.

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Hold DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
0
BUY 3
HOLD 12
SELL 1
STRONG
SELL
0
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Platform & Compounding FCF

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

C+ 59.7 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for platform & compounding fcf businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 25%
F 17.6
  • 5yr Avg ROIC 3.0% 25/100
  • Operating Margin Trend -3.13 pp/yr 0/100
Contributes 4.4 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
A- 83.8
  • 5yr Avg ROE 15.3% 81/100
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR -2.3% 90/100
Contributes 12.6 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 25%
A 87.2
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR 11.5% 84/100
  • 5yr EPS CAGR 13.1% 84/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 5/5 100/100
Contributes 21.8 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 20%
A- 84.2
  • 5yr FCF Margin 43.5% 100/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion 6.81x 65/100
Contributes 16.9 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 10%
F 12.1
  • Net Debt / EBITDA 17.77x 0/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 0.95x 13/100
  • Altman Z-Score 1.74 33/100
Contributes 1.2 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 5%
C 56.6
  • EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.55 26/100
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 0/5 100/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 6 67/100
Contributes 2.8 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Holding

1 of 1 gurus held; 1 added.

Holders
1
Avg Δ position
+21.4%
New buys
0
Full exits
0
As of Q2 2026
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (25%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (25%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, 5yr EPS CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (20%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (10%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (5%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.