Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. logo FBIN - Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Hold DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
1
BUY 10
HOLD 14
SELL 2
STRONG
SELL
0
| PRICE TARGET: $57.67 DETAILS
HIGH: $70.00
LOW: $44.00
MEDIAN: $56.00
CONSENSUS: $57.67
UPSIDE: 26.44%
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Cyclical & Capital-Intensive

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

C+ 59.7 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for cyclical & capital-intensive businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 15%
C- 50.4
  • 5yr Avg ROIC 9.9% 59/100
  • Operating Margin Trend -0.63 pp/yr 30/100
Contributes 7.6 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
A+ 94.3
  • 5yr Avg ROE 21.6% 94/100
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR -2.9% 94/100
Contributes 14.2 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 10%
D- 29.3
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR 4.3% 55/100
  • 5yr EPS CAGR -8.9% 2/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 1/5 20/100
Contributes 2.9 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 15%
A- 83.7
  • 5yr FCF Margin 10.5% 71/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion 1.06x 99/100
Contributes 12.6 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 25%
C 53.6
  • Net Debt / EBITDA 3.19x 46/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 4.52x 60/100
  • Altman Z-Score 2.58 59/100
Contributes 13.4 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 20%
C- 45.0
  • EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.34 52/100
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 4/5 20/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 5 56/100
Contributes 9.0 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Accumulating

2 of 2 gurus held; 2 new buys.

Holders
2
Avg Δ position
New buys
2
Full exits
0
As of Q3 2011
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (15%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (10%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, 5yr EPS CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (15%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (25%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (20%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.