Yum! Brands, Inc. logo YUM - Yum! Brands, Inc.

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Hold DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
0
BUY 20
HOLD 28
SELL 3
STRONG
SELL
0
| PRICE TARGET: $175.40 DETAILS
HIGH: $185.00
LOW: $168.00
MEDIAN: $174.00
CONSENSUS: $175.40
UPSIDE: 14.65%
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Stable Earnings Power

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

B+ 75.7 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for stable earnings power businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 20%
A- 81.2
  • 5yr Avg ROIC 42.1% 100/100
  • Operating Margin Trend -0.35 pp/yr 37/100
Contributes 16.2 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
A 87.2
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR -2.0% 87/100
Contributes 13.1 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 15%
A- 83.0
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR 7.8% 74/100
  • 5yr EPS CAGR 13.6% 85/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 5/5 100/100
Contributes 12.5 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 15%
A 90.7
  • 5yr FCF Margin 19.3% 89/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion 0.93x 93/100
Contributes 13.6 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 20%
C- 47.6
  • Net Debt / EBITDA 4.02x 30/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 5.15x 66/100
  • Altman Z-Score 2.55 58/100
Contributes 9.5 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 15%
B 72.2
  • EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.22 68/100
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 0/5 100/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 5 56/100
Contributes 10.8 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Dumping

5 of 5 gurus held; 1 new buy; 4 trimmed.

Holders
5 +1
Avg Δ position
-52.0%
New buys
1
Full exits
0
As of Q2 2026
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (20%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (15%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, 5yr EPS CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (15%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (20%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (15%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.