Is WHR a high-quality business?

AlphaMadera's AlphaQuality grade scores Whirlpool Corporation on six pillars — profitability, capital efficiency, balance-sheet strength, growth durability, cash generation, and shareholder yield. The composite letter grade reflects how WHR compares to a Buffett-style quality bar.

What is Whirlpool Corporation's AlphaQuality grade?

AlphaQuality assigns a letter grade (A through F) to WHR based on a six-pillar quantitative model. The live page shows the composite grade plus each pillar's individual score with the underlying metrics.

What makes WHR a quality stock?

AlphaQuality looks at return on capital, free-cash-flow margins, debt-to-equity, revenue stability, dividend and buyback policy, and operating-margin trend. Stocks scoring well across all six pillars earn higher grades — the methodology favors compounders over cyclicals.

WHR - Whirlpool Corporation

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Hold DETAILS | PRICE TARGET: $48.75 DETAILS

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Stable Earnings Power

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

F 30.0 / 100 pillar composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for stable earnings power businesses. Purely quantitative — no stock price or analyst input.

⚠ 2 of the last 5 fiscal years showed negative net income — AlphaQuality will not grade above F for persistent unprofitability in a stable earnings power business.

Grade overrides the 30.0 pillar composite because hard gates always win. Use the pillar breakdown below to see where the underlying numbers sit.

Profitability

Weight: 20%

D- 27.2

5yr Avg ROIC 4.5% 33/100
Operating Margin Trend -1.28 pp/yr 14/100

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%

C 56.8

5yr Avg ROE 5.4% 37/100
5yr Share-Count CAGR -2.8% 93/100

Growth Quality

Weight: 15%

F 5.5

5yr Revenue CAGR -8.3% 3/100
5yr EPS CAGR -33.2% 0/100
Revenue-Growth Years (5) 1/5 20/100

Cash Generation

Weight: 15%

C- 50.9

5yr FCF Margin 3.3% 41/100
5yr FCF/NI Conversion 0.66x 62/100

Balance Sheet

Weight: 20%

F 18.7

Net Debt / EBITDA 6.19x 6/100
Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 2.41x 35/100
Altman Z-Score 1.27 22/100

Stability

Weight: 15%

D- 31.4

EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.61 22/100
Piotroski F-Score 5 56/100
Negative-Revenue Years (5) 4/5 20/100

4 of 5 gurus held; 1 added; 3 trimmed; 1 full exit.

Holders: 4 -1
Avg Δ position: -38.9%
New buys: 0
Full exits: 1

Dalio sold -100%
Greenblatt decreased -69%
Cooperman decreased -50%

How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

Profitability (20%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
Growth Quality (15%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, 5yr EPS CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
Cash Generation (15%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
Balance Sheet (20%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
Stability (15%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Piotroski F-Score, Negative-Revenue Years (5)

We deliberately ignore stock price, analyst targets, and consensus ratings so the grade is suitable for backtesting forward returns. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required; distressed and highly leveraged infrastructure businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.