Veeva Systems Inc. logo VEEV - Veeva Systems Inc.

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Buy DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
0
BUY 29
HOLD 13
SELL 1
STRONG
SELL
0
| PRICE TARGET: $249.76 DETAILS
HIGH: $320.00
LOW: $165.00
MEDIAN: $270.00
CONSENSUS: $249.76
UPSIDE: 1.62%
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Platform & Compounding FCF

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

A- 82.4 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for platform & compounding fcf businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 25%
B 69.5
  • 5yr Avg ROIC 11.4% 67/100
  • Operating Margin Trend +0.66 pp/yr 75/100
Contributes 17.4 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
B- 64.6
  • 5yr Avg ROE 12.8% 73/100
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR 0.8% 50/100
Contributes 9.7 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 25%
A+ 94.7
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR 16.9% 94/100
  • 5yr EPS CAGR 18.2% 92/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 5/5 100/100
Contributes 23.7 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 20%
A+ 94.8
  • 5yr FCF Margin 39.2% 100/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion 1.61x 88/100
Contributes 19.0 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 10%
A+ 100.0
  • Net Debt / EBITDA -5.19x 100/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 30.00x 100/100
  • Altman Z-Score 15.90 100/100
Contributes 10.0 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 5%
C 52.6
  • EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.66 17/100
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 0/5 100/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 6 67/100
Contributes 2.6 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Dumping

5 of 5 gurus held; 1 new buy; 3 added; 1 trimmed; 2 full exits.

Holders
5 +2
Avg Δ position
+4.1%
New buys
1
Full exits
2
As of Q2 2026
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (25%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (25%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, 5yr EPS CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (20%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (10%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (5%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.