Titan International, Inc. logo TWI - Titan International, Inc.

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Hold DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
1
BUY 2
HOLD 5
SELL 1
STRONG
SELL
0
| PRICE TARGET: $13.00 DETAILS
HIGH: $13.00
LOW: $13.00
MEDIAN: $13.00
CONSENSUS: $13.00
UPSIDE: 84.92%
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Cyclical & Capital-Intensive

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

D+ 40.3 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for cyclical & capital-intensive businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 15%
D+ 42.9
  • 5yr Avg ROIC 9.4% 57/100
  • Operating Margin Trend -1.50 pp/yr 10/100
Contributes 6.4 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
B- 66.6
  • 5yr Avg ROE 14.3% 78/100
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR 0.9% 46/100
Contributes 10.0 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 10%
B 69.5
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR 7.7% 74/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 3/5 60/100
Contributes 6.9 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 15%
D+ 42.9
  • 5yr FCF Margin 2.6% 38/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion 0.53x 49/100
Contributes 6.4 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 25%
F 17.6
  • Net Debt / EBITDA 5.37x 12/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 0.71x 9/100
  • Altman Z-Score 1.87 37/100
Contributes 4.4 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 20%
D- 31.1
  • EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.85 6/100
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 2/5 60/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 4 44/100
Contributes 6.2 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Accumulating

2 of 2 gurus held; 2 new buys.

Holders
2 +2
Avg Δ position
New buys
2
Full exits
0
As of Q2 2026
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (15%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (10%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (15%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (25%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (20%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.