TTM Technologies, Inc. logo TTMI - TTM Technologies, Inc.

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Buy DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
0
BUY 12
HOLD 2
SELL 0
STRONG
SELL
0
| PRICE TARGET: $209.33 DETAILS
HIGH: $215.00
LOW: $205.00
MEDIAN: $208.00
CONSENSUS: $209.33
UPSIDE: 95.42%
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Stable Earnings Power

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

C+ 57.6 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for stable earnings power businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 20%
D+ 43.9
  • 5yr Avg ROIC 5.0% 35/100
  • Operating Margin Trend +0.31 pp/yr 64/100
Contributes 8.8 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
C- 44.7
  • 5yr Avg ROE 4.5% 32/100
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR -0.2% 68/100
Contributes 6.7 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 15%
C 54.0
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR 6.7% 68/100
  • 5yr EPS CAGR 0.1% 21/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 4/5 80/100
Contributes 8.1 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 15%
B- 65.8
  • 5yr FCF Margin 2.9% 39/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion 1.11x 98/100
Contributes 9.9 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 20%
B+ 79.7
  • Net Debt / EBITDA 1.53x 77/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 5.64x 68/100
  • Altman Z-Score 4.84 99/100
Contributes 15.9 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 15%
C 54.4
  • EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.57 25/100
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 1/5 80/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 7 78/100
Contributes 8.2 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Dumping

4 of 4 gurus held; 2 new buys; 1 added; 1 trimmed; 2 full exits.

Holders
4 +1
Avg Δ position
-38.5%
New buys
2
Full exits
2
As of Q2 2026
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (20%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (15%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, 5yr EPS CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (15%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (20%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (15%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.