Tyson Foods, Inc. logo TSN - Tyson Foods, Inc.

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Buy DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
0
BUY 15
HOLD 14
SELL 1
STRONG
SELL
0
| PRICE TARGET: $69.67 DETAILS
HIGH: $78.00
LOW: $65.00
MEDIAN: $66.00
CONSENSUS: $69.67
UPSIDE: 21.86%
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Stable Earnings Power

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

C- 48.9 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for stable earnings power businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 20%
F 26.8
  • 5yr Avg ROIC 5.5% 37/100
  • Operating Margin Trend -1.90 pp/yr 2/100
Contributes 5.4 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
C+ 58.3
  • 5yr Avg ROE 7.4% 47/100
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR -1.0% 79/100
Contributes 8.7 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 15%
D+ 42.2
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR 4.8% 58/100
  • 5yr EPS CAGR -24.8% 0/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 4/5 80/100
Contributes 6.3 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 15%
B- 62.4
  • 5yr FCF Margin 2.3% 37/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion 1.35x 94/100
Contributes 9.4 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 20%
C 55.3
  • Net Debt / EBITDA 2.95x 51/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 2.71x 40/100
  • Altman Z-Score 3.08 81/100
Contributes 11.1 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 15%
C 53.6
  • EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.50 30/100
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 1/5 80/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 6 67/100
Contributes 8.0 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Holding

4 of 4 gurus held; 2 added; 2 trimmed.

Holders
4
Avg Δ position
-25.3%
New buys
0
Full exits
0
As of Q2 2026
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (20%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (15%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, 5yr EPS CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (15%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (20%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (15%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.