Is TNDM a high-quality business?

AlphaMadera's AlphaQuality grade scores Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. on six pillars — profitability, capital efficiency, balance-sheet strength, growth durability, cash generation, and shareholder yield. The composite letter grade reflects how TNDM compares to a Buffett-style quality bar.

What is Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.'s AlphaQuality grade?

AlphaQuality assigns a letter grade (A through F) to TNDM based on a six-pillar quantitative model. The live page shows the composite grade plus each pillar's individual score with the underlying metrics.

What makes TNDM a quality stock?

AlphaQuality looks at return on capital, free-cash-flow margins, debt-to-equity, revenue stability, dividend and buyback policy, and operating-margin trend. Stocks scoring well across all six pillars earn higher grades — the methodology favors compounders over cyclicals.

TNDM - Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Buy DETAILS | PRICE TARGET: $30.17 DETAILS

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Stable Earnings Power

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

F 30.0 / 100 pillar composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for stable earnings power businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

⚠ 4 of the last 5 fiscal years showed negative net income — AlphaQuality will not grade above F for persistent unprofitability in a stable earnings power business.

Grade overrides the 30.0 pillar composite because hard gates always win. Use the pillar breakdown below to see where the underlying numbers sit.

Profitability

Weight: 20%

F 0.0

5yr Avg ROIC -13.0% 0/100
Operating Margin Trend -2.08 pp/yr 0/100

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%

F 11.4

5yr Avg ROE -51.5% 0/100
5yr Share-Count CAGR 2.0% 33/100

Growth Quality

Weight: 15%

A 87.7

5yr Revenue CAGR 15.3% 91/100
Revenue-Growth Years (5) 4/5 80/100

Cash Generation

Weight: 15%

C- 45.4

5yr FCF Margin 0.9% 29/100
5yr FCF/NI Conversion 5.64x 65/100

Balance Sheet

Weight: 20%

F 0.6

Net Debt / EBITDA 10.00x 0/100
Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) -24.33x 0/100
Altman Z-Score 0.16 2/100

Stability

Weight: 15%

C 54.5

Negative-Revenue Years (5) 1/5 80/100
Piotroski F-Score 3 33/100

2 of 2 gurus held; 1 added; 1 trimmed.

Holders: 2
Avg Δ position: +110.2%
New buys: 0
Full exits: 0

Wood increased +233%
Cooperman decreased -13%

How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

Profitability (20%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
Growth Quality (15%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
Cash Generation (15%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
Balance Sheet (20%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
Stability (15%) — Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.