Scorpio Tankers Inc. logo STNG - Scorpio Tankers Inc.

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Buy DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
0
BUY 22
HOLD 8
SELL 1
STRONG
SELL
0
| PRICE TARGET: $90.00 DETAILS
HIGH: $94.00
LOW: $86.00
MEDIAN: $90.00
CONSENSUS: $90.00
UPSIDE: 20.24%
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Stable Earnings Power

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

B 72.9 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for stable earnings power businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 20%
B 73.2
  • 5yr Avg ROIC 10.4% 62/100
  • Operating Margin Trend +10.99 pp/yr 100/100
Contributes 14.6 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
A- 81.7
  • 5yr Avg ROE 13.6% 75/100
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR -2.8% 93/100
Contributes 12.3 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 15%
C- 49.8
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR 0.5% 24/100
  • 5yr EPS CAGR 33.3% 100/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 1/5 20/100
Contributes 7.5 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 15%
A+ 98.1
  • 5yr FCF Margin 43.6% 100/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion 1.25x 96/100
Contributes 14.7 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 20%
A 88.5
  • Net Debt / EBITDA -0.22x 96/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 6.12x 69/100
  • Altman Z-Score 4.53 98/100
Contributes 17.7 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 15%
D+ 40.9
  • EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.46 35/100
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 4/5 20/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 6 67/100
Contributes 6.1 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Dumping

2 of 4 gurus held; 1 added; 1 trimmed; 2 full exits.

Holders
2 -2
Avg Δ position
+10.8%
New buys
0
Full exits
2
As of Q2 2026
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (20%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (15%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, 5yr EPS CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (15%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (20%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (15%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.