Seneca Foods Corporation logo SENEA - Seneca Foods Corporation

Price: -- --
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Stable Earnings Power

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

C 54.7 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for stable earnings power businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 20%
C+ 57.6
  • 5yr Avg ROIC 6.9% 44/100
  • Operating Margin Trend +1.22 pp/yr 88/100
Contributes 11.5 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
B- 68.9
  • 5yr Avg ROE 8.4% 52/100
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR -5.5% 100/100
Contributes 10.3 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 15%
C- 46.6
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR 2.5% 41/100
  • 5yr EPS CAGR 3.9% 47/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 3/5 60/100
Contributes 7.0 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 15%
F 14.4
  • 5yr FCF Margin 0.2% 26/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion -4.86x 0/100
Contributes 2.2 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 20%
A- 85.0
  • Net Debt / EBITDA 1.16x 83/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 7.87x 76/100
  • Altman Z-Score 4.93 100/100
Contributes 17.0 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 15%
C- 44.8
  • EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.83 7/100
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 2/5 60/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 8 89/100
Contributes 6.7 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Accumulating

4 of 4 gurus held; 3 added.

Holders
4
Avg Δ position
+27.2%
New buys
0
Full exits
0
As of Q2 2026
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (20%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (15%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, 5yr EPS CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (15%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (20%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (15%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.