Is SAIC a high-quality business?

AlphaMadera's AlphaQuality grade scores Science Applications International Corporation on six pillars — profitability, capital efficiency, balance-sheet strength, growth durability, cash generation, and shareholder yield. The composite letter grade reflects how SAIC compares to a Buffett-style quality bar.

What is Science Applications International Corporation's AlphaQuality grade?

AlphaQuality assigns a letter grade (A through F) to SAIC based on a six-pillar quantitative model. The live page shows the composite grade plus each pillar's individual score with the underlying metrics.

What makes SAIC a quality stock?

AlphaQuality looks at return on capital, free-cash-flow margins, debt-to-equity, revenue stability, dividend and buyback policy, and operating-margin trend. Stocks scoring well across all six pillars earn higher grades — the methodology favors compounders over cyclicals.

SAIC - Science Applications International Corporation

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Hold DETAILS | PRICE TARGET: $97.50 DETAILS

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Platform & Compounding FCF

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

B- 66.5 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for platform & compounding fcf businesses. Purely quantitative — no stock price or analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 25%

B- 68.3

5yr Avg ROIC 12.2% 71/100
Operating Margin Trend +0.27 pp/yr 63/100

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%

A+ 98.6

5yr Avg ROE 23.7% 98/100
5yr Share-Count CAGR -5.4% 100/100

Growth Quality

Weight: 25%

C- 49.8

5yr Revenue CAGR -0.4% 19/100
5yr EPS CAGR 12.7% 83/100
Revenue-Growth Years (5) 3/5 60/100

Cash Generation

Weight: 20%

B 72.3

5yr FCF Margin 6.4% 56/100
5yr FCF/NI Conversion 1.42x 93/100

Balance Sheet

Weight: 10%

C- 48.7

Net Debt / EBITDA 3.80x 34/100
Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 4.02x 55/100
Altman Z-Score 2.75 68/100

Stability

Weight: 5%

C 56.7

EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.42 41/100
Piotroski F-Score 7 78/100
Negative-Revenue Years (5) 2/5 60/100

3 of 3 gurus held; 1 new buy; 1 added; 1 trimmed; 1 full exit.

Holders: 3
Avg Δ position: +350.5%
New buys: 1
Full exits: 1

Cooperman new
Laffont sold -100%
Greenblatt increased +789%

How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

Profitability (25%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
Growth Quality (25%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, 5yr EPS CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
Cash Generation (20%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
Balance Sheet (10%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
Stability (5%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Piotroski F-Score, Negative-Revenue Years (5)

We deliberately ignore stock price, analyst targets, and consensus ratings so the grade is suitable for backtesting forward returns. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required; distressed and highly leveraged infrastructure businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.