PicS N.V. logo PICS - PicS N.V.

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Buy DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
0
BUY 2
HOLD 0
SELL 0
STRONG
SELL
0
| PRICE TARGET: $16.75 DETAILS
HIGH: $20.00
LOW: $15.00
MEDIAN: $16.00
CONSENSUS: $16.75
UPSIDE: 88.63%
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Stable Earnings Power

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

F 30.0 / 100 pillar composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for stable earnings power businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

⚠ 2 of the last 5 fiscal years showed negative net income — AlphaQuality will not grade above F for persistent unprofitability in a stable earnings power business.

Grade overrides the 30.0 pillar composite because hard gates always win. Use the pillar breakdown below to see where the underlying numbers sit.

Profitability

Weight: 20%
D- 30.0
  • 5yr Avg ROIC -21.6% 0/100
  • Operating Margin Trend +41.90 pp/yr 100/100
Contributes 6.0 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
F 0.0
  • 5yr Avg ROE -121.7% 0/100
Contributes 0.0 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 15%
A- 80.0
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 4/5 80/100
Contributes 12.0 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 15%
C+ 61.3
  • 5yr FCF Margin 7.1% 58/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion 11.55x 65/100
Contributes 9.2 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 20%
C- 47.5
  • Net Debt / EBITDA -7.72x 100/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 0.09x 1/100
  • Altman Z-Score 0.57 9/100
Contributes 9.5 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 15%
D+ 41.7
  • EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 1.26 0/100
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 0/5 100/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 5 56/100
Contributes 6.3 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Dumping

0 of 2 gurus held; 2 full exits.

Holders
0 -2
Avg Δ position
—
New buys
0
Full exits
2
As of Q2 2026
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (20%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE
  • Growth Quality (15%) — Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (15%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (20%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (15%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.