Ormat Technologies, Inc. logo ORA - Ormat Technologies, Inc.

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Hold DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
0
BUY 8
HOLD 9
SELL 0
STRONG
SELL
0
| PRICE TARGET: $134.00 DETAILS
HIGH: $152.00
LOW: $112.00
MEDIAN: $138.00
CONSENSUS: $134.00
UPSIDE: 28.00%
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Stable Earnings Power

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

D- 32.9 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for stable earnings power businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 20%
D- 27.1
  • 5yr Avg ROIC 4.9% 35/100
  • Operating Margin Trend -1.54 pp/yr 9/100
Contributes 5.4 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
F 26.6
  • 5yr Avg ROE 4.4% 32/100
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR 3.4% 16/100
Contributes 4.0 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 15%
B- 64.5
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR 7.0% 70/100
  • 5yr EPS CAGR 4.1% 48/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 4/5 80/100
Contributes 9.7 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 15%
F 0.0
  • 5yr FCF Margin -27.5% 0/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion -2.46x 0/100
Contributes 0.0 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 20%
F 22.5
  • Net Debt / EBITDA 4.81x 18/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 1.75x 24/100
  • Altman Z-Score 1.55 29/100
Contributes 4.5 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 15%
C+ 61.9
  • EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.25 64/100
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 1/5 80/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 4 44/100
Contributes 9.3 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Dumping

3 of 3 gurus held; 3 added; 2 full exits.

Holders
3
Avg Δ position
+1296.1%
New buys
0
Full exits
2
As of Q2 2026
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (20%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (15%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, 5yr EPS CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (15%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (20%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (15%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.