Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. logo MLM - Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Buy DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
0
BUY 23
HOLD 17
SELL 0
STRONG
SELL
0
| PRICE TARGET: $663.90 DETAILS
HIGH: $785.00
LOW: $556.00
MEDIAN: $654.00
CONSENSUS: $663.90
UPSIDE: 24.11%
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Cyclical & Capital-Intensive

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

B- 68.5 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for cyclical & capital-intensive businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 15%
B 70.4
  • 5yr Avg ROIC 9.6% 58/100
  • Operating Margin Trend +3.24 pp/yr 100/100
Contributes 10.6 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
B+ 75.7
  • 5yr Avg ROE 14.0% 77/100
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR -0.6% 74/100
Contributes 11.4 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 10%
B 73.7
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR 6.7% 69/100
  • 5yr EPS CAGR 10.3% 77/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 4/5 80/100
Contributes 7.4 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 15%
B 71.4
  • 5yr FCF Margin 11.7% 74/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion 0.70x 68/100
Contributes 10.7 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 25%
B 70.7
  • Net Debt / EBITDA 2.44x 61/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 6.62x 71/100
  • Altman Z-Score 3.46 87/100
Contributes 17.7 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 20%
C 53.6
  • EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.59 23/100
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 1/5 80/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 7 78/100
Contributes 10.7 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Holding

3 of 3 gurus held; 2 added; 1 trimmed; 1 full exit.

Holders
3 +1
Avg Δ position
+25.1%
New buys
0
Full exits
1
As of Q2 2026
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (15%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (10%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, 5yr EPS CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (15%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (25%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (20%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.