Meta Platforms, Inc. logo META - Meta Platforms, Inc.

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Buy DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
2
BUY 50
HOLD 11
SELL 2
STRONG
SELL
0
| PRICE TARGET: $723.69 DETAILS
HIGH: $883.00
LOW: $595.00
MEDIAN: $725.00
CONSENSUS: $723.69
UPSIDE: 33.11%
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Platform & Compounding FCF

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

A 91.9 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for platform & compounding fcf businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 25%
A+ 93.3
  • 5yr Avg ROIC 19.4% 90/100
  • Operating Margin Trend +2.09 pp/yr 100/100
Contributes 23.3 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
A+ 96.3
  • 5yr Avg ROE 27.5% 100/100
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR -2.3% 90/100
Contributes 14.5 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 25%
A 92.2
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR 18.5% 97/100
  • 5yr EPS CAGR 18.4% 93/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 4/5 80/100
Contributes 23.1 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 20%
A+ 94.8
  • 5yr FCF Margin 27.6% 98/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion 0.91x 91/100
Contributes 19.0 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 10%
A+ 97.7
  • Net Debt / EBITDA 0.02x 95/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 73.76x 100/100
  • Altman Z-Score 7.59 100/100
Contributes 9.8 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 5%
D+ 43.1
  • EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.70 14/100
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 1/5 80/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 5 56/100
Contributes 2.2 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Holding

10 of 11 gurus held; 6 added; 4 trimmed; 2 full exits.

Holders
10 -1
Avg Δ position
+6.4%
New buys
0
Full exits
2
As of Q2 2026
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (25%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (25%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, 5yr EPS CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (20%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (10%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (5%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.