Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. logo KW - Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc.

Inactive Ticker KW is not actively trading. Quotes and analytics may be stale.
Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Buy DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
0
BUY 5
HOLD 0
SELL 2
STRONG
SELL
0
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Stable Earnings Power

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

F 28.5 / 100 pillar composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for stable earnings power businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

⚠ 2 of the last 5 fiscal years showed negative net income — AlphaQuality will not grade above F for persistent unprofitability in a stable earnings power business.

Grade overrides the 28.5 pillar composite because hard gates always win. Use the pillar breakdown below to see where the underlying numbers sit.

Profitability

Weight: 20%
C- 46.4
  • 5yr Avg ROIC 2.7% 23/100
  • Operating Margin Trend +6.76 pp/yr 100/100
Contributes 9.3 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
D 33.9
  • 5yr Avg ROE 0.9% 14/100
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR -0.3% 70/100
Contributes 5.1 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 15%
F 24.5
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR 2.0% 37/100
  • 5yr EPS CAGR -46.1% 0/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 2/5 40/100
Contributes 3.7 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 15%
D- 29.2
  • 5yr FCF Margin -8.6% 0/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion 21.53x 65/100
Contributes 4.4 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 20%
F 5.6
  • Net Debt / EBITDA 10.54x 0/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 1.16x 15/100
  • Altman Z-Score 0.26 4/100
Contributes 1.1 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 15%
D- 32.5
  • EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.86 5/100
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 3/5 40/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 6 67/100
Contributes 4.9 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Insufficient Data

Not enough curated-guru data to call a flow.

As of Q2 2026
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (20%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (15%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, 5yr EPS CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (15%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (20%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (15%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.