Is GLPI a high-quality business?

AlphaMadera's AlphaQuality grade scores Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. on six pillars — profitability, capital efficiency, balance-sheet strength, growth durability, cash generation, and shareholder yield. The composite letter grade reflects how GLPI compares to a Buffett-style quality bar.

What is Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.'s AlphaQuality grade?

AlphaQuality assigns a letter grade (A through F) to GLPI based on a six-pillar quantitative model. The live page shows the composite grade plus each pillar's individual score with the underlying metrics.

What makes GLPI a quality stock?

AlphaQuality looks at return on capital, free-cash-flow margins, debt-to-equity, revenue stability, dividend and buyback policy, and operating-margin trend. Stocks scoring well across all six pillars earn higher grades — the methodology favors compounders over cyclicals.

GLPI - Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Buy DETAILS | PRICE TARGET: $50.00 DETAILS

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Real Estate Investment Trust

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

B- 66.3 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for real estate investment trust businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 20%

A+ 100.0

Scored using FFO margin — REIT-archetype substitution.

FFO Margin 69.5% 100/100

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%

C 56.4

5yr Avg ROE 17.8% 87/100
5yr Share-Count CAGR 5.0% 0/100

Growth Quality

Weight: 15%

B 72.3

Scored using FFO/share — REIT-archetype substitution.

5yr FFO/Share CAGR 3.0% 60/100
Positive-FFO Years (5) 5/5 100/100

Cash Generation

Weight: 15%

C 56.1

Scored using AFFO dividend coverage — REIT substitution.

AFFO Dividend Coverage 0.95x 39/100
5yr FCF/NI 1.28x 95/100

Balance Sheet

Weight: 25%

C- 45.5

Scored using Debt/Assets — REIT-archetype substitution.

Debt / Assets 60.4% 44/100
Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 3.28x 48/100

Stability

Weight: 10%

B 71.2

EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.29 58/100
Negative-Revenue Years (5) 0/5 100/100
Piotroski F-Score 6 67/100

4 of 4 gurus held; 1 new buy; 3 added.

Holders: 4 +3
Avg Δ position: +19.9%
New buys: 1
Full exits: 0

Wood new
Greenblatt increased +20%
Cooperman increased

How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

Profitability (20%) — FFO Margin
Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
Growth Quality (15%) — 5yr FFO/Share CAGR, Positive-FFO Years (5)
Cash Generation (15%) — AFFO Dividend Coverage, 5yr FCF/NI
Balance Sheet (25%) — Debt / Assets, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int)
Stability (10%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.