Glass House Brands Inc. logo GLASF - Glass House Brands Inc.

Inactive Ticker GLASF is not actively trading. Quotes and analytics may be stale.
Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Buy DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
0
BUY 2
HOLD 0
SELL 0
STRONG
SELL
0
| PRICE TARGET: $12.00 DETAILS
HIGH: $12.00
LOW: $12.00
MEDIAN: $12.00
CONSENSUS: $12.00
UPSIDE: 11.21%
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Cyclical & Capital-Intensive

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

D- 32.5 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for cyclical & capital-intensive businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 15%
D- 30.0
  • 5yr Avg ROIC -9.7% 0/100
  • Operating Margin Trend +14.29 pp/yr 100/100
Contributes 4.5 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
F 0.0
  • 5yr Avg ROE -29.0% 0/100
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR 28.2% 0/100
Contributes 0.0 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 10%
A+ 93.8
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR 30.9% 100/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 4/5 80/100
Contributes 9.4 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 15%
D- 29.2
  • 5yr FCF Margin -50.7% 0/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion 34.87x 65/100
Contributes 4.4 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 25%
F 8.3
  • Net Debt / EBITDA 47.55x 0/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) -2.07x 0/100
  • Altman Z-Score 1.73 33/100
Contributes 2.1 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 20%
C+ 60.6
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 1/5 80/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 4 44/100
Contributes 12.1 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Not Followed

Not held by any curated guru.

How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (15%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (10%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (15%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (25%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (20%) — Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.