Is FRPH a high-quality business?

AlphaMadera's AlphaQuality grade scores FRP Holdings, Inc. on six pillars — profitability, capital efficiency, balance-sheet strength, growth durability, cash generation, and shareholder yield. The composite letter grade reflects how FRPH compares to a Buffett-style quality bar.

What is FRP Holdings, Inc.'s AlphaQuality grade?

AlphaQuality assigns a letter grade (A through F) to FRPH based on a six-pillar quantitative model. The live page shows the composite grade plus each pillar's individual score with the underlying metrics.

What makes FRPH a quality stock?

AlphaQuality looks at return on capital, free-cash-flow margins, debt-to-equity, revenue stability, dividend and buyback policy, and operating-margin trend. Stocks scoring well across all six pillars earn higher grades — the methodology favors compounders over cyclicals.

FRPH - FRP Holdings, Inc.

Price: -- --

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Stable Earnings Power

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

C- 46.7 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for stable earnings power businesses. Purely quantitative — no stock price or analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 20%

C- 45.0

5yr Avg ROIC 2.3% 21/100
Operating Margin Trend +2.49 pp/yr 100/100

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%

D 33.6

5yr Avg ROE 2.2% 21/100
5yr Share-Count CAGR 0.4% 57/100

Growth Quality

Weight: 15%

C 54.0

5yr Revenue CAGR 8.2% 76/100
5yr EPS CAGR -42.0% 0/100
Revenue-Growth Years (5) 5/5 100/100

Cash Generation

Weight: 15%

A- 84.2

5yr FCF Margin 115.2% 100/100
5yr FCF/NI Conversion 7.44x 65/100

Balance Sheet

Weight: 20%

F 25.8

Net Debt / EBITDA 4.92x 16/100
Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 2.27x 33/100
Altman Z-Score 1.78 35/100

Stability

Weight: 15%

C- 45.0

EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 1.44 0/100
Piotroski F-Score 6 67/100
Negative-Revenue Years (5) 0/5 100/100

Not enough curated-guru data to call a flow.

Wood new

How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

Profitability (20%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
Growth Quality (15%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, 5yr EPS CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
Cash Generation (15%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
Balance Sheet (20%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
Stability (15%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Piotroski F-Score, Negative-Revenue Years (5)

We deliberately ignore stock price, analyst targets, and consensus ratings so the grade is suitable for backtesting forward returns. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required; distressed and highly leveraged infrastructure businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.