ESCO Technologies Inc. logo ESE - ESCO Technologies Inc.

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Buy DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
0
BUY 9
HOLD 6
SELL 0
STRONG
SELL
0
| PRICE TARGET: $413.00 DETAILS
HIGH: $413.00
LOW: $413.00
MEDIAN: $413.00
CONSENSUS: $413.00
UPSIDE: 43.78%
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Platform & Compounding FCF

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

B 70.6 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for platform & compounding fcf businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 25%
C+ 57.5
  • 5yr Avg ROIC 6.9% 45/100
  • Operating Margin Trend +1.18 pp/yr 88/100
Contributes 14.4 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
B- 62.6
  • 5yr Avg ROE 10.0% 60/100
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR -0.2% 68/100
Contributes 9.4 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 25%
A- 81.2
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR 8.4% 76/100
  • 5yr EPS CAGR 67.4% 100/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 3/5 60/100
Contributes 20.3 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 20%
A- 80.1
  • 5yr FCF Margin 11.0% 72/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion 0.90x 90/100
Contributes 16.0 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 10%
A 90.6
  • Net Debt / EBITDA 0.53x 90/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 9.73x 84/100
  • Altman Z-Score 6.71 100/100
Contributes 9.1 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 5%
D- 28.0
  • EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.84 7/100
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 2/5 60/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 3 33/100
Contributes 1.4 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Dumping

3 of 5 gurus held; 1 added; 2 trimmed; 2 full exits.

Holders
3 -2
Avg Δ position
-22.1%
New buys
0
Full exits
2
As of Q2 2026
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (25%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (25%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, 5yr EPS CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (20%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (10%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (5%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.