EPAM Systems, Inc. logo EPAM - EPAM Systems, Inc.

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Buy DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
0
BUY 23
HOLD 13
SELL 1
STRONG
SELL
0
| PRICE TARGET: $119.00 DETAILS
HIGH: $167.00
LOW: $85.00
MEDIAN: $115.00
CONSENSUS: $119.00
UPSIDE: 3.66%
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Platform & Compounding FCF

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

B 72.5 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for platform & compounding fcf businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 25%
C 54.0
  • 5yr Avg ROIC 11.7% 69/100
  • Operating Margin Trend -1.01 pp/yr 20/100
Contributes 13.5 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
B+ 75.8
  • 5yr Avg ROE 13.6% 75/100
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR -0.8% 77/100
Contributes 11.4 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 25%
B 73.0
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR 15.5% 91/100
  • 5yr EPS CAGR 3.7% 45/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 4/5 80/100
Contributes 18.3 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 20%
A- 83.1
  • 5yr FCF Margin 10.8% 72/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion 1.19x 97/100
Contributes 16.6 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 10%
A+ 100.0
  • Net Debt / EBITDA -1.83x 100/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 30.00x 100/100
  • Altman Z-Score 5.42 100/100
Contributes 10.0 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 5%
C 53.4
  • EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.50 30/100
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 1/5 80/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 6 67/100
Contributes 2.7 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Accumulating

3 of 3 gurus held; 1 new buy; 2 added.

Holders
3 +1
Avg Δ position
+924.0%
New buys
1
Full exits
0
As of Q2 2026
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (25%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (25%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, 5yr EPS CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (20%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (10%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (5%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.