The Vita Coco Company, Inc. logo COCO - The Vita Coco Company, Inc.

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Buy DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
0
BUY 9
HOLD 3
SELL 3
STRONG
SELL
0
| PRICE TARGET: $79.00 DETAILS
HIGH: $90.00
LOW: $68.00
MEDIAN: $78.00
CONSENSUS: $79.00
UPSIDE: 24.27%
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Stable Earnings Power

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

B 74.7 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for stable earnings power businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 20%
A 89.1
  • 5yr Avg ROIC 16.8% 84/100
  • Operating Margin Trend +2.77 pp/yr 100/100
Contributes 17.8 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
B 69.1
  • 5yr Avg ROE 17.4% 86/100
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR 1.6% 38/100
Contributes 10.4 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 15%
A 91.1
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR 14.4% 90/100
  • 5yr EPS CAGR 15.1% 88/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 5/5 100/100
Contributes 13.7 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 15%
D+ 39.8
  • 5yr FCF Margin 5.8% 53/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion 0.24x 24/100
Contributes 6.0 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 20%
A+ 100.0
  • Net Debt / EBITDA -1.94x 100/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 30.00x 100/100
  • Altman Z-Score 20.36 100/100
Contributes 20.0 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 15%
C- 45.6
  • EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.67 16/100
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 0/5 100/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 4 44/100
Contributes 6.8 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Accumulating

5 of 5 gurus held; 2 new buys; 2 added; 1 trimmed.

Holders
5 +3
Avg Δ position
+3.8%
New buys
2
Full exits
0
As of Q2 2026
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (20%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (15%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, 5yr EPS CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (15%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (20%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (15%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.