Baidu, Inc. logo BIDU - Baidu, Inc.

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Buy DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
0
BUY 40
HOLD 12
SELL 1
STRONG
SELL
0
| PRICE TARGET: $118.50 DETAILS
HIGH: $158.00
LOW: $80.00
MEDIAN: $118.00
CONSENSUS: $118.50
UPSIDE: 28.04%
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Stable Earnings Power

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

C- 45.7 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for stable earnings power businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 20%
D+ 42.2
  • 5yr Avg ROIC 4.8% 34/100
  • Operating Margin Trend +0.23 pp/yr 62/100
Contributes 8.4 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
C- 47.7
  • 5yr Avg ROE 5.5% 38/100
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR -0.1% 66/100
Contributes 7.2 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 15%
D- 31.0
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR 3.8% 51/100
  • 5yr EPS CAGR -29.0% 0/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 2/5 40/100
Contributes 4.6 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 15%
C- 50.8
  • 5yr FCF Margin 7.5% 60/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion 0.42x 40/100
Contributes 7.6 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 20%
B 72.1
  • Net Debt / EBITDA -0.76x 99/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 3.41x 49/100
  • Altman Z-Score 2.33 51/100
Contributes 14.4 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 15%
F 23.6
  • EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.68 15/100
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 3/5 40/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 2 22/100
Contributes 3.5 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Accumulating

4 of 4 gurus held; 1 new buy; 3 added.

Holders
4 +1
Avg Δ position
+103.6%
New buys
1
Full exits
0
As of Q2 2026
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (20%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (15%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, 5yr EPS CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (15%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (20%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (15%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.