AXIA Energia S.A. logo AXIA - AXIA Energia S.A.

Inactive Ticker AXIA is not actively trading. Quotes and analytics may be stale.
Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Buy DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
0
BUY 4
HOLD 1
SELL 0
STRONG
SELL
0
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Platform & Compounding FCF

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

D 35.1 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for platform & compounding fcf businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 25%
C 52.8
  • 5yr Avg ROIC 4.5% 33/100
  • Operating Margin Trend +2.06 pp/yr 100/100
Contributes 13.2 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
F 25.2
  • 5yr Avg ROE 5.8% 39/100
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR 7.7% 0/100
Contributes 3.8 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 25%
C 52.2
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR 10.2% 81/100
  • 5yr EPS CAGR -11.1% 0/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 4/5 80/100
Contributes 13.1 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 20%
F 11.2
  • 5yr FCF Margin -0.9% 20/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion -0.64x 0/100
Contributes 2.2 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 10%
F 4.0
  • Net Debt / EBITDA 13.76x 0/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) -0.16x 0/100
  • Altman Z-Score 1.03 16/100
Contributes 0.4 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 5%
C- 48.4
  • EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.64 19/100
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 1/5 80/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 6 67/100
Contributes 2.4 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Insufficient Data

Not enough curated-guru data to call a flow.

As of Q2 2026
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (25%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (25%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, 5yr EPS CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (20%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (10%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (5%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.