AlphaMadera's AlphaVal page computes Verisk Analytics, Inc.'s fair value using a multi-method blend (DCF, comparable-multiples, and Graham-style intrinsic value), then compares it to the current market price to flag VRSK as undervalued, fairly valued, or overvalued.

What is Verisk Analytics, Inc.'s fair value?

Fair value for VRSK is a model output combining discounted cash flow projections, peer-group multiples, and a Graham number floor. The live AlphaVal page shows the blended fair value alongside each method's individual estimate.

How does AlphaMadera value VRSK?

AlphaVal uses three primary techniques: a five-year discounted-cash-flow projection with terminal multiple, peer-group multiple analysis (P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S), and Graham's defensive-investor intrinsic-value formula. Inputs come from VRSK's most recent reported fundamentals.

VRSK - Verisk Analytics, Inc.

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Hold DETAILS | PRICE TARGET: $231.25 DETAILS

AlphaVal

Deterministic, archetype-aware fair value

Stable Earnings Power 65% confidence

Primary model: P/Adj-EPS × Normalized Multiple

Valuation Signal Overvalued Mild

Trading 3.2% above fair value

Current Price $171.11

Bear Case $138.78 18.9% downside ($138.78 - $171.11) / $171.11 = -18.9% $6.70 × 18x P/E

Fair Value $165.77 3.1% downside ($165.77 - $171.11) / $171.11 = -3.1% $6.70 × 22x P/E

Bull Case $192.76 12.7% upside ($192.76 - $171.11) / $171.11 = 12.7% $6.70 × 25x P/E

Adjust Assumptions

P/E Multiple

21.5x

Adjusted EPS

6.7$

Key Value Driver

Normalized P/E multiple (22x base case)

Implied Market Multiple 25.6x

Plain-Language Summary

Our base-case estimate uses a valuation based on adjusted earnings per share and a normalized price-to-earnings multiple. We then blend that result with the average analyst price target of $231.25 from 25 analysts, using a 25% weight on analyst consensus. That produces an estimated intrinsic value of $165.77 per share.

Warnings

ℹ Wall Street's average price target is $231.25 (from 25 analysts). Our estimate is 38% below the consensus -- consider that gap carefully.

Key Risks

Growth DCF inappropriate — terminal value assumptions dominate
EV/EBITDA misleading for regulated businesses where capex is mandated
Regulatory risk is a fat tail not visible in normal multiples