AlphaMadera's AlphaVal page computes Vipshop Holdings Limited's fair value using a multi-method blend (DCF, comparable-multiples, and Graham-style intrinsic value), then compares it to the current market price to flag VIPS as undervalued, fairly valued, or overvalued.

What is Vipshop Holdings Limited's fair value?

Fair value for VIPS is a model output combining discounted cash flow projections, peer-group multiples, and a Graham number floor. The live AlphaVal page shows the blended fair value alongside each method's individual estimate.

How does AlphaMadera value VIPS?

AlphaVal uses three primary techniques: a five-year discounted-cash-flow projection with terminal multiple, peer-group multiple analysis (P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S), and Graham's defensive-investor intrinsic-value formula. Inputs come from VIPS's most recent reported fundamentals.

VIPS - Vipshop Holdings Limited

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Buy DETAILS | PRICE TARGET: $18.50 DETAILS

AlphaVal

Deterministic, archetype-aware fair value

Stable Earnings Power 80% confidence

Primary model: P/Adj-EPS × Normalized Multiple

Valuation Signal Undervalued Strong

Trading 54.7% below fair value

Current Price $14.74

Bear Case $28.47 93.2% upside ($28.47 - $14.74) / $14.74 = 93.2% $2.10 × 16x P/E

Fair Value $32.55 120.8% upside ($32.55 - $14.74) / $14.74 = 120.8% $2.10 × 18x P/E

Bull Case $36.61 148.4% upside ($36.61 - $14.74) / $14.74 = 148.4% $2.10 × 20x P/E

Adjust Assumptions

P/E Multiple

17.7x

Adjusted EPS

2.1$

Key Value Driver

Normalized P/E multiple (18x base case)

Implied Market Multiple 7.0x

Plain-Language Summary

Our base-case estimate uses a valuation based on adjusted earnings per share and a normalized price-to-earnings multiple. We then blend that result with the average analyst price target of $18.50 from 28 analysts, using a 25% weight on analyst consensus. That produces an estimated intrinsic value of $32.55 per share.

Warnings

ℹ Wall Street's average price target is $18.50 (from 28 analysts). Our estimate is 101% above the consensus -- consider that gap carefully.

ℹ Financial statements were converted from CNY into USD using USDCNY at 0.1478 USD per CNY.

Key Risks

Growth DCF inappropriate — terminal value assumptions dominate
EV/EBITDA misleading for regulated businesses where capex is mandated
Regulatory risk is a fat tail not visible in normal multiples