Is UMH a high-quality business?

AlphaMadera's AlphaQuality grade scores UMH Properties, Inc. on six pillars — profitability, capital efficiency, balance-sheet strength, growth durability, cash generation, and shareholder yield. The composite letter grade reflects how UMH compares to a Buffett-style quality bar.

What is UMH Properties, Inc.'s AlphaQuality grade?

AlphaQuality assigns a letter grade (A through F) to UMH based on a six-pillar quantitative model. The live page shows the composite grade plus each pillar's individual score with the underlying metrics.

What makes UMH a quality stock?

AlphaQuality looks at return on capital, free-cash-flow margins, debt-to-equity, revenue stability, dividend and buyback policy, and operating-margin trend. Stocks scoring well across all six pillars earn higher grades — the methodology favors compounders over cyclicals.

UMH - UMH Properties, Inc.

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Buy DETAILS | PRICE TARGET: $16.50 DETAILS

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Real Estate Investment Trust

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

D+ 40.7 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for real estate investment trust businesses. Purely quantitative — no stock price or analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 20%

C+ 60.9

Scored using FFO margin — REIT-archetype substitution.

FFO Margin 35.6% 61/100

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%

F 13.8

5yr Avg ROE 2.3% 21/100
5yr Share-Count CAGR 15.9% 0/100

Growth Quality

Weight: 15%

D- 30.0

Scored using FFO/share — REIT-archetype substitution.

5yr FFO/Share CAGR -14.4% 0/100
Positive-FFO Years (5) 5/5 100/100

Cash Generation

Weight: 15%

F 19.5

Scored using AFFO dividend coverage — REIT substitution.

AFFO Dividend Coverage 0.00x 0/100
5yr FCF/NI 5.78x 65/100

Balance Sheet

Weight: 25%

C+ 58.1

Scored using Debt/Assets — REIT-archetype substitution.

Debt / Assets 44.8% 75/100
Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 1.89x 26/100

Stability

Weight: 10%

C- 45.0

EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 1.16 0/100
Piotroski F-Score 6 67/100
Negative-Revenue Years (5) 0/5 100/100

2 of 2 gurus held; 1 added; 1 trimmed.

Holders: 2 +1
Avg Δ position: -81.0%
New buys: 0
Full exits: 0

Wood decreased -81%
Cooperman increased

How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

Profitability (20%) — FFO Margin
Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
Growth Quality (15%) — 5yr FFO/Share CAGR, Positive-FFO Years (5)
Cash Generation (15%) — AFFO Dividend Coverage, 5yr FCF/NI
Balance Sheet (25%) — Debt / Assets, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int)
Stability (10%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Piotroski F-Score, Negative-Revenue Years (5)

We deliberately ignore stock price, analyst targets, and consensus ratings so the grade is suitable for backtesting forward returns. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required; distressed and highly leveraged infrastructure businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.