Tyler Technologies, Inc. logo TYL - Tyler Technologies, Inc.

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Buy DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
0
BUY 25
HOLD 12
SELL 0
STRONG
SELL
0
| PRICE TARGET: $414.38 DETAILS
HIGH: $455.00
LOW: $340.00
MEDIAN: $422.50
CONSENSUS: $414.38
UPSIDE: 17.44%
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Platform & Compounding FCF

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

B 71.5 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for platform & compounding fcf businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 25%
C- 49.0
  • 5yr Avg ROIC 5.5% 37/100
  • Operating Margin Trend +0.71 pp/yr 76/100
Contributes 12.3 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
C- 44.8
  • 5yr Avg ROE 7.0% 45/100
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR 1.1% 44/100
Contributes 6.7 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 25%
A 87.0
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR 15.9% 92/100
  • 5yr EPS CAGR 9.0% 73/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 5/5 100/100
Contributes 21.8 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 20%
A- 86.3
  • 5yr FCF Margin 22.0% 92/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion 2.05x 79/100
Contributes 17.3 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 10%
A+ 99.5
  • Net Debt / EBITDA -0.78x 99/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 79.14x 100/100
  • Altman Z-Score 5.68 100/100
Contributes 9.9 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 5%
B 70.9
  • EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.35 50/100
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 0/5 100/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 7 78/100
Contributes 3.5 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Dumping

2 of 3 gurus held; 1 added; 2 full exits.

Holders
2 -1
Avg Δ position
+46.1%
New buys
0
Full exits
2
As of Q2 2026
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (25%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (25%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, 5yr EPS CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (20%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (10%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (5%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.