Is SVTMF undervalued?

AlphaMadera's AlphaVal page classifies SM Investments Corporation as a Stable Earnings Power business and values it using P/Adj-EPS × Normalized Multiple, then compares the result to the current market price to flag SVTMF as undervalued, fairly valued, or overvalued.

What is SM Investments Corporation's fair value?

Fair value for SVTMF comes from a P/Adj-EPS × Normalized Multiple model -- the approach AlphaVal selected for this company's Stable Earnings Power classification. The live AlphaVal page shows bear, base, and bull scenarios alongside the key assumption behind each.

How does AlphaMadera value SVTMF?

AlphaVal routes each company to one of ten valuation archetypes based on its business model. SVTMF was classified as Stable Earnings Power and is valued using P/Adj-EPS × Normalized Multiple, built from SVTMF's most recent reported fundamentals.

SVTMF - SM Investments Corporation

Price: -- --

AlphaVal

Deterministic, archetype-aware fair value

Stable Earnings Power 80% confidence

Primary model: P/Adj-EPS × Normalized Multiple

Valuation Signal Undervalued Strong

Trading 57.2% below fair value

Current Price $8.59

Bear Case $17.55 104.4% upside ($17.55 - $8.59) / $8.59 = 104.4% $1.17 × 15x P/E

Fair Value $20.06 133.6% upside ($20.06 - $8.59) / $8.59 = 133.6% $1.17 × 17x P/E

Bull Case $22.57 162.7% upside ($22.57 - $8.59) / $8.59 = 162.7% $1.17 × 19x P/E

Adjust Assumptions

P/E Multiple

17.2x

Adjusted EPS

1.17$

Key Value Driver

Normalized P/E multiple (17x base case)

Terminal Value % of EV

Implied Market Multiple 7.4x

Market is pricing in (growth)

Plain-Language Summary

Applying a 17x P/E to adjusted EPS of $1.17, the base-case value is $20.06 per share. DDM cross-check: $85.55.

Warnings

ℹ Dividend-based valuation: $85.55 (above our primary estimate by 326%). Large gaps may signal the dividend doesn't reflect full earning power.

ℹ Financial statements were converted from PHP into USD using USDPHP at 0.0157 USD per PHP.

Key Risks

Growth DCF inappropriate — terminal value assumptions dominate
EV/EBITDA misleading for regulated businesses where capex is mandated
Regulatory risk is a fat tail not visible in normal multiples