Seagate Technology Holdings plc logo STX - Seagate Technology Holdings plc

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Buy DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
1
BUY 27
HOLD 20
SELL 4
STRONG
SELL
0
| PRICE TARGET: $1,130.15 DETAILS
HIGH: $1,600.00
LOW: $875.00
MEDIAN: $1,090.00
CONSENSUS: $1,130.15
UPSIDE: 35.69%
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Stable Earnings Power

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

A- 82.5 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for stable earnings power businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 20%
A+ 100.0
  • 5yr Avg ROIC 26.6% 100/100
  • Operating Margin Trend +5.90 pp/yr 100/100
Contributes 20.0 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
A+ 93.9
  • 5yr Avg ROE 829.9% 100/100
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR -1.3% 83/100
Contributes 14.1 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 15%
B- 64.7
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR 2.7% 42/100
  • 5yr EPS CAGR 21.0% 96/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 3/5 60/100
Contributes 9.7 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 15%
A- 86.7
  • 5yr FCF Margin 12.8% 77/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion 1.07x 99/100
Contributes 13.0 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 20%
A 92.8
  • Net Debt / EBITDA 0.51x 90/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 13.99x 91/100
  • Altman Z-Score 16.30 100/100
Contributes 18.6 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 15%
C- 47.6
  • EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.71 13/100
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 2/5 60/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 8 89/100
Contributes 7.1 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Accumulating

7 of 7 gurus held; 2 new buys; 1 added; 4 trimmed.

Holders
7 +2
Avg Δ position
-9.4%
New buys
2
Full exits
0
As of Q2 2026
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (20%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (15%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, 5yr EPS CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (15%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (20%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (15%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.