RadNet, Inc. logo RDNT - RadNet, Inc.

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Buy DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
1
BUY 8
HOLD 2
SELL 0
STRONG
SELL
0
| PRICE TARGET: $78.00 DETAILS
HIGH: $91.00
LOW: $65.00
MEDIAN: $78.00
CONSENSUS: $78.00
UPSIDE: 1.54%
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Platform & Compounding FCF

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

C- 46.2 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for platform & compounding fcf businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 25%
D- 31.8
  • 5yr Avg ROIC 3.0% 25/100
  • Operating Margin Trend -0.12 pp/yr 48/100
Contributes 7.9 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
F 15.0
  • 5yr Avg ROE 2.6% 23/100
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR 8.1% 0/100
Contributes 2.3 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 25%
A 91.9
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR 13.7% 88/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 5/5 100/100
Contributes 23.0 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 20%
D+ 41.2
  • 5yr FCF Margin -0.6% 22/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion 4.52x 65/100
Contributes 8.2 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 10%
D- 29.6
  • Net Debt / EBITDA 4.30x 26/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 1.46x 19/100
  • Altman Z-Score 2.25 49/100
Contributes 3.0 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 5%
D 35.6
  • EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.96 1/100
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 0/5 100/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 3 33/100
Contributes 1.8 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Dumping

2 of 3 gurus held; 2 trimmed; 2 full exits.

Holders
2 -1
Avg Δ position
-57.9%
New buys
0
Full exits
2
As of Q2 2026
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (25%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (25%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (20%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (10%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (5%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.