Matador Resources Company logo MTDR - Matador Resources Company

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Buy DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
0
BUY 32
HOLD 10
SELL 0
STRONG
SELL
0
| PRICE TARGET: $71.09 DETAILS
HIGH: $93.00
LOW: $54.00
MEDIAN: $68.00
CONSENSUS: $71.09
UPSIDE: 16.45%
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Oil & Gas E&P

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

B- 62.0 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for oil & gas e&p businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 15%
B- 63.4
  • 5yr Avg ROIC 19.4% 91/100
  • Operating Margin Trend -4.68 pp/yr 0/100
Contributes 9.5 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 10%
B+ 78.3
  • 5yr Avg ROE 24.4% 99/100
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR 1.4% 40/100
Contributes 7.8 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 5%
A+ 93.8
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR 33.7% 100/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 4/5 80/100
Contributes 4.7 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 25%
B- 64.4
  • 5yr FCF Margin 14.9% 82/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion 0.46x 43/100
Contributes 16.1 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 25%
B- 64.7
  • Net Debt / EBITDA 1.42x 79/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 5.96x 69/100
  • Altman Z-Score 1.78 34/100
Contributes 16.2 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 20%
D 38.3
  • EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.64 18/100
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 1/5 80/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 3 33/100
Contributes 7.7 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Holding

3 of 3 gurus held; 1 full exit.

Holders
3
Avg Δ position
0.0%
New buys
0
Full exits
1
As of Q2 2026
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (15%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (10%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (5%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (25%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (25%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (20%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.