LendingClub Corporation logo LC - LendingClub Corporation

Inactive Ticker LC is not actively trading. Quotes and analytics may be stale.
Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Buy DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
0
BUY 15
HOLD 10
SELL 0
STRONG
SELL
0
| PRICE TARGET: $22.50 DETAILS
HIGH: $22.50
LOW: $22.50
MEDIAN: $22.50
CONSENSUS: $22.50
UPSIDE: 17.13%
AlphaVal

AlphaVal

Deterministic, archetype-aware fair value

Banks, Insurers & Asset Managers 80% confidence

Primary model: P/Tangible Book × ROE Quality

Valuation Signal Overvalued Strong
Trading 180.5% above fair value
Current Price $19.21
Bear Case $3.91 79.7% downside ($3.91 - $19.21) / $19.21 = -79.7% ROTCE 7.2% → 0.32x TBV
Fair Value $6.85 64.4% downside ($6.85 - $19.21) / $19.21 = -64.4% ROTCE 9.6% → 0.56x TBV
Bull Case $8.61 55.2% downside ($8.61 - $19.21) / $19.21 = -55.2% ROTCE 11.0% → 0.70x TBV

Adjust Assumptions

9.6%
14.0%

Key Value Driver

ROTCE (9.6%) vs. cost of equity (14.0%)

Implied Market Multiple 1.56x

Plain-Language Summary

With ROTCE of 9.6% vs. 14.0% cost of equity, fair P/TBV is 0.56x on $12.29 tangible book, implying $6.85 per share.

Analyst Consensus (External Reference)

Never blended into the bear/base/bull estimates above -- shown only as an outside comparison.

Average Target (25 analysts) $22.50
Analyst Range $22.50 – $22.50
Divergence from AlphaVal 70%

Warnings

Traditional cash flow models don't work well for banks — lending activity distorts how much cash the business actually generates.
Common valuation shortcuts don't apply here — for banks, interest payments are a core business cost, not overhead.
Return on equity (9.6%) is below the minimum investors require (14.0%). This means the bank is worth less than the net assets on its books.
Wall Street's average price target is $22.50 (from 25 analysts). Our estimate is 70% below the consensus -- consider that gap carefully.

Key Risks

  • Book value quality matters as much as level — check loan loss reserves
  • Interest rate sensitivity creates non-linear earnings surprises
  • Insurance reserving is actuarial, not financial — errors emerge slowly