Is HLAN a high-quality business?

AlphaMadera's AlphaQuality grade scores Heartland BancCorp on six pillars — profitability, capital efficiency, balance-sheet strength, growth durability, cash generation, and shareholder yield. The composite letter grade reflects how HLAN compares to a Buffett-style quality bar.

What is Heartland BancCorp's AlphaQuality grade?

AlphaQuality assigns a letter grade (A through F) to HLAN based on a six-pillar quantitative model. The live page shows the composite grade plus each pillar's individual score with the underlying metrics.

What makes HLAN a quality stock?

AlphaQuality looks at return on capital, free-cash-flow margins, debt-to-equity, revenue stability, dividend and buyback policy, and operating-margin trend. Stocks scoring well across all six pillars earn higher grades — the methodology favors compounders over cyclicals.

HLAN - Heartland BancCorp

Price: -- --

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Banks, Insurers & Asset Managers

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

C- 49.8 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for banks, insurers & asset managers businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 25%

D- 32.2

Scored using efficiency ratio — bank-archetype substitution.

Efficiency Ratio (FY2023) 103.3% 0/100
Efficiency Ratio Trend -1.47 pp/yr 92/100

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%

C- 49.1

5yr Avg ROE 11.5% 67/100
5yr Share-Count CAGR 3.5% 15/100

Growth Quality

Weight: 15%

A 89.8

Scored using revenue growth cross-checked against efficiency-ratio trend — bank-archetype substitution.

5yr Revenue CAGR 11.5% 84/100
Efficiency Ratio Trend (growth quality check) -1.47 pp/yr 92/100
Revenue-Growth Years (5) 5/5 100/100

Cash Generation

Weight: 15%

F 0.0

Scored using efficiency-ratio stability — bank-archetype substitution.

Efficiency Ratio Stability (σ) 0.33 0/100

Balance Sheet

Weight: 20%

B 69.7

Scored using equity-to-assets — bank-archetype substitution.

Equity / Assets 8.6% 70/100

Stability

Weight: 10%

B- 68.6

EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.33 52/100
Negative-Revenue Years (5) 0/5 100/100
Piotroski F-Score 6 67/100

Not held by any curated guru.

How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

Profitability (25%) — Efficiency Ratio (FY2023), Efficiency Ratio Trend
Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
Growth Quality (15%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, Efficiency Ratio Trend (growth quality check), Revenue-Growth Years (5)
Cash Generation (15%) — Efficiency Ratio Stability (σ)
Balance Sheet (20%) — Equity / Assets
Stability (10%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.