Five Point Holdings, LLC logo FPH - Five Point Holdings, LLC

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Hold DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
0
BUY 2
HOLD 3
SELL 0
STRONG
SELL
0
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Stable Earnings Power

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

D+ 39.2 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for stable earnings power businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 20%
C+ 59.4
  • 5yr Avg ROIC 6.4% 42/100
  • Operating Margin Trend +10.37 pp/yr 100/100
Contributes 11.9 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
F 22.3
  • 5yr Avg ROE 4.8% 34/100
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR 17.5% 0/100
Contributes 3.3 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 15%
F 23.4
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR -6.5% 7/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 3/5 60/100
Contributes 3.5 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 15%
F 0.0
  • 5yr FCF Margin -52.2% 0/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion -1.62x 0/100
Contributes 0.0 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 20%
B+ 78.9
  • Net Debt / EBITDA 0.41x 91/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 30.00x 100/100
  • Altman Z-Score 1.69 32/100
Contributes 15.8 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 15%
D- 31.5
  • EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.82 7/100
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 2/5 60/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 4 44/100
Contributes 4.7 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Insufficient Data

Not enough curated-guru data to call a flow.

As of Q2 2026
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (20%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (15%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (15%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (20%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (15%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.