Darden Restaurants, Inc. logo DRI - Darden Restaurants, Inc.

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Buy DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
0
BUY 37
HOLD 21
SELL 1
STRONG
SELL
0
| PRICE TARGET: $229.11 DETAILS
HIGH: $245.00
LOW: $212.00
MEDIAN: $230.00
CONSENSUS: $229.11
UPSIDE: 3.39%
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Stable Earnings Power

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

B+ 79.0 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for stable earnings power businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 20%
B 72.6
  • 5yr Avg ROIC 15.5% 81/100
  • Operating Margin Trend -0.04 pp/yr 53/100
Contributes 14.5 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
A+ 97.3
  • 5yr Avg ROE 46.8% 100/100
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR -2.7% 92/100
Contributes 14.6 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 15%
A 90.7
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR 12.9% 87/100
  • 5yr EPS CAGR 16.8% 91/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 5/5 100/100
Contributes 13.6 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 15%
B+ 78.4
  • 5yr FCF Margin 8.7% 65/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion 0.95x 95/100
Contributes 11.8 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 20%
B- 67.9
  • Net Debt / EBITDA 2.50x 60/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 9.15x 82/100
  • Altman Z-Score 2.71 65/100
Contributes 13.6 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 15%
B 72.4
  • EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.38 46/100
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 0/5 100/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 8 89/100
Contributes 10.9 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Trimming

3 of 4 gurus held; 1 added; 2 trimmed; 1 full exit.

Holders
3 -1
Avg Δ position
-22.8%
New buys
0
Full exits
1
As of Q2 2026
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (20%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (15%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, 5yr EPS CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (15%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (20%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (15%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.