Is CRSR a high-quality business?

AlphaMadera's AlphaQuality grade scores Corsair Gaming, Inc. on six pillars — profitability, capital efficiency, balance-sheet strength, growth durability, cash generation, and shareholder yield. The composite letter grade reflects how CRSR compares to a Buffett-style quality bar.

What is Corsair Gaming, Inc.'s AlphaQuality grade?

AlphaQuality assigns a letter grade (A through F) to CRSR based on a six-pillar quantitative model. The live page shows the composite grade plus each pillar's individual score with the underlying metrics.

What makes CRSR a quality stock?

AlphaQuality looks at return on capital, free-cash-flow margins, debt-to-equity, revenue stability, dividend and buyback policy, and operating-margin trend. Stocks scoring well across all six pillars earn higher grades — the methodology favors compounders over cyclicals.

CRSR - Corsair Gaming, Inc.

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Hold DETAILS | PRICE TARGET: $7.75 DETAILS

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Platform & Compounding FCF

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

F 22.3 / 100 pillar composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for platform & compounding fcf businesses. Purely quantitative — no stock price or analyst input.

⚠ 4 of the last 5 fiscal years showed negative net income — AlphaQuality will not grade above F for persistent unprofitability in a platform & compounding fcf business.

Grade overrides the 22.3 pillar composite because hard gates always win. Use the pillar breakdown below to see where the underlying numbers sit.

Profitability

Weight: 25%

F 13.2

5yr Avg ROIC 0.7% 14/100
Operating Margin Trend -1.40 pp/yr 12/100

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%

F 18.0

5yr Avg ROE -1.7% 7/100
5yr Share-Count CAGR 1.5% 39/100

Growth Quality

Weight: 25%

F 15.4

5yr Revenue CAGR -6.2% 8/100
5yr EPS CAGR -82.8% 0/100
Revenue-Growth Years (5) 3/5 60/100

Cash Generation

Weight: 20%

F 25.0

5yr FCF Margin 2.6% 38/100
5yr FCF/NI Conversion 0.09x 9/100

Balance Sheet

Weight: 10%

C 54.4

Net Debt / EBITDA 0.44x 91/100
Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) -0.30x 0/100
Altman Z-Score 2.43 55/100

Stability

Weight: 5%

D+ 41.7

EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 1.06 0/100
Piotroski F-Score 8 89/100
Negative-Revenue Years (5) 2/5 60/100

1 of 2 gurus held; 1 added; 2 full exits.

Holders: 1 -1
Avg Δ position: +191.1%
New buys: 0
Full exits: 2

Greenblatt sold -100%
Wood sold -100%
Cooperman increased +191%

How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

Profitability (25%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
Growth Quality (25%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, 5yr EPS CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
Cash Generation (20%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
Balance Sheet (10%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
Stability (5%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Piotroski F-Score, Negative-Revenue Years (5)

We deliberately ignore stock price, analyst targets, and consensus ratings so the grade is suitable for backtesting forward returns. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required; distressed and highly leveraged infrastructure businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.