Cadence Design Systems, Inc. logo CDNS - Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Buy DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
0
BUY 26
HOLD 4
SELL 1
STRONG
SELL
0
| PRICE TARGET: $404.56 DETAILS
HIGH: $450.00
LOW: $300.00
MEDIAN: $425.00
CONSENSUS: $404.56
UPSIDE: 18.85%
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Platform & Compounding FCF

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

A 89.9 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for platform & compounding fcf businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 25%
A- 86.5
  • 5yr Avg ROIC 18.4% 88/100
  • Operating Margin Trend +0.91 pp/yr 82/100
Contributes 21.6 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
A 90.1
  • 5yr Avg ROE 25.9% 100/100
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR -0.5% 72/100
Contributes 13.5 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 25%
A 90.5
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR 14.6% 90/100
  • 5yr EPS CAGR 14.0% 86/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 5/5 100/100
Contributes 22.6 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 20%
A+ 97.8
  • 5yr FCF Margin 30.1% 100/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion 1.30x 95/100
Contributes 19.6 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 10%
A+ 95.7
  • Net Debt / EBITDA -0.28x 96/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 14.06x 91/100
  • Altman Z-Score 14.41 100/100
Contributes 9.6 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 5%
C+ 59.6
  • EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.56 25/100
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 0/5 100/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 7 78/100
Contributes 3.0 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Dumping

4 of 4 gurus held; 4 trimmed.

Holders
4
Avg Δ position
-74.6%
New buys
0
Full exits
0
As of Q2 2026
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (25%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (25%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, 5yr EPS CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (20%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (10%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (5%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.