Burlington Stores, Inc. logo BURL - Burlington Stores, Inc.

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Buy DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
0
BUY 32
HOLD 3
SELL 0
STRONG
SELL
0
| PRICE TARGET: $383.44 DETAILS
HIGH: $440.00
LOW: $310.00
MEDIAN: $400.00
CONSENSUS: $383.44
UPSIDE: 40.48%
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Platform & Compounding FCF

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

B- 66.6 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for platform & compounding fcf businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 25%
C- 50.2
  • 5yr Avg ROIC 7.5% 48/100
  • Operating Margin Trend +0.04 pp/yr 56/100
Contributes 12.6 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
A 90.7
  • 5yr Avg ROE 37.5% 100/100
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR -0.6% 73/100
Contributes 13.6 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 25%
A 87.3
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR 14.9% 91/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 4/5 80/100
Contributes 21.8 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 20%
C- 45.6
  • 5yr FCF Margin 2.3% 37/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion 0.61x 57/100
Contributes 9.1 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 10%
B- 63.5
  • Net Debt / EBITDA 3.66x 37/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 12.49x 89/100
  • Altman Z-Score 3.09 81/100
Contributes 6.4 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 5%
B- 62.2
  • EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.41 42/100
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 1/5 80/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 7 78/100
Contributes 3.1 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Holding

4 of 4 gurus held; 1 new buy; 2 added; 1 trimmed.

Holders
4 +1
Avg Δ position
+52.0%
New buys
1
Full exits
0
As of Q2 2026
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (25%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (25%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (20%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (10%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (5%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.