Bumble Inc. logo BMBL - Bumble Inc.

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Hold DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
0
BUY 5
HOLD 17
SELL 1
STRONG
SELL
0
| PRICE TARGET: $3.75 DETAILS
HIGH: $5.00
LOW: $3.00
MEDIAN: $3.50
CONSENSUS: $3.75
UPSIDE: 33.93%
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Platform & Compounding FCF

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

F 30.0 / 100 pillar composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for platform & compounding fcf businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

⚠ 4 of the last 5 fiscal years showed negative net income — AlphaQuality will not grade above F for persistent unprofitability in a platform & compounding fcf business.

Grade overrides the 30.0 pillar composite because hard gates always win. Use the pillar breakdown below to see where the underlying numbers sit.

Profitability

Weight: 25%
C+ 59.5
  • 5yr Avg ROIC 6.4% 42/100
  • Operating Margin Trend +8.37 pp/yr 100/100
Contributes 14.9 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
D- 27.6
  • 5yr Avg ROE -35.4% 0/100
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR -0.9% 79/100
Contributes 4.1 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 25%
A- 81.1
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR 10.7% 82/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 4/5 80/100
Contributes 20.3 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 20%
C+ 58.2
  • 5yr FCF Margin 14.9% 82/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion 0.29x 29/100
Contributes 11.6 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 10%
C+ 60.9
  • Net Debt / EBITDA 0.83x 87/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 5.99x 69/100
  • Altman Z-Score 0.32 5/100
Contributes 6.1 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 5%
B- 66.7
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 1/5 80/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 5 56/100
Contributes 3.3 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Dumping

0 of 3 gurus held; 4 full exits.

Holders
0 -3
Avg Δ position
New buys
0
Full exits
4
As of Q2 2026
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (25%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (25%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (20%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (10%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (5%) — Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.