Aeva Technologies, Inc. logo AEVA - Aeva Technologies, Inc.

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Buy DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
0
BUY 6
HOLD 2
SELL 0
STRONG
SELL
0
| PRICE TARGET: $28.75 DETAILS
HIGH: $42.00
LOW: $20.00
MEDIAN: $26.50
CONSENSUS: $28.75
UPSIDE: 83.28%
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Cyclical & Capital-Intensive

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

D 34.7 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for cyclical & capital-intensive businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 15%
D- 30.0
  • 5yr Avg ROIC -62.7% 0/100
  • Operating Margin Trend +271.53 pp/yr 100/100
Contributes 4.5 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
F 0.0
  • 5yr Avg ROE -277.2% 0/100
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR 6.2% 0/100
Contributes 0.0 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 10%
A+ 93.8
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR 30.1% 100/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 4/5 80/100
Contributes 9.4 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 15%
F 0.0
  • 5yr FCF Margin -1714.1% 0/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion 0.00x 0/100
Contributes 0.0 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 25%
D- 30.0
  • Net Debt / EBITDA 10.00x 0/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 30.00x 100/100
  • Altman Z-Score -3.86 0/100
Contributes 7.5 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 20%
B- 66.7
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 1/5 80/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 5 56/100
Contributes 13.3 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Accumulating

3 of 3 gurus held; 3 added.

Holders
3 +2
Avg Δ position
+11.0%
New buys
0
Full exits
0
As of Q2 2026
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (15%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (10%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (15%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (25%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (20%) — Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.