ACM Research, Inc. logo ACMR - ACM Research, Inc.

Price: -- -- | CONSENSUS: Buy DETAILS
STRONG
BUY
0
BUY 8
HOLD 2
SELL 0
STRONG
SELL
0
| PRICE TARGET: $113.20 DETAILS
HIGH: $136.00
LOW: $75.00
MEDIAN: $125.00
CONSENSUS: $113.20
UPSIDE: 63.07%
AlphaQuality

AlphaQuality

Quantitative six-pillar business-quality grade

Cyclical & Capital-Intensive

AlphaQuality — archetype-weighted quantitative grade

C+ 57.0 / 100 composite

Composite Grade

Composite of six pillars weighted for cyclical & capital-intensive businesses. Purely quantitative — the six pillars score only reported financials, no analyst input.

Profitability

Weight: 15%
C 54.2
  • 5yr Avg ROIC 9.5% 57/100
  • Operating Margin Trend -0.14 pp/yr 47/100
Contributes 8.1 pts toward composite.

Capital Efficiency

Weight: 15%
C- 47.1
  • 5yr Avg ROE 7.9% 49/100
  • 5yr Share-Count CAGR 1.2% 43/100
Contributes 7.1 pts toward composite.

Growth Quality

Weight: 10%
A+ 100.0
  • 5yr Revenue CAGR 41.9% 100/100
  • 5yr EPS CAGR 35.5% 100/100
  • Revenue-Growth Years (5) 5/5 100/100
Contributes 10.0 pts toward composite.

Cash Generation

Weight: 15%
F 0.0
  • 5yr FCF Margin -16.5% 0/100
  • 5yr FCF/NI Conversion -1.42x 0/100
Contributes 0.0 pts toward composite.

Balance Sheet

Weight: 25%
A+ 99.0
  • Net Debt / EBITDA -5.46x 100/100
  • Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int) 20.44x 100/100
  • Altman Z-Score 4.19 96/100
Contributes 24.7 pts toward composite.

Stability

Weight: 20%
D 35.7
  • EPS Volatility (σ/μ) 0.78 9/100
  • Negative-Revenue Years (5) 0/5 100/100
  • Piotroski F-Score 2 22/100
Contributes 7.1 pts toward composite.

Guru Flow

Curated superinvestor sentiment — not part of the AlphaQuality grade.
Accumulating

4 of 4 gurus held; 2 new buys; 2 added.

Holders
4 +3
Avg Δ position
+24.2%
New buys
2
Full exits
0
As of Q2 2026
How this is calculated

AlphaQuality grades six pillars from 0-100 and weights each by archetype:

  • Profitability (15%) — 5yr Avg ROIC, Operating Margin Trend
  • Capital Efficiency (15%) — 5yr Avg ROE, 5yr Share-Count CAGR
  • Growth Quality (10%) — 5yr Revenue CAGR, 5yr EPS CAGR, Revenue-Growth Years (5)
  • Cash Generation (15%) — 5yr FCF Margin, 5yr FCF/NI Conversion
  • Balance Sheet (25%) — Net Debt / EBITDA, Interest Coverage (EBIT/Int), Altman Z-Score
  • Stability (20%) — EPS Volatility (σ/μ), Negative-Revenue Years (5), Piotroski F-Score

The six pillars read only reported financial-statement fields — no analyst targets or consensus ratings. The archetype that picks which pillar formulas apply is not fully price-free, though: it can route a company to the distressed/ungradable archetype based on price vs. its 52-week high, and beta affects one classification check. A minimum of 5 fiscal years of audited statements is required. Insurers and banks are graded on their own methodology — insurers on loss ratio, its trend and stability, and premiums-to-surplus; banks on the efficiency ratio, its trend and stability, and equity-to-assets — rather than on industrial margin/ROIC signals. Distressed, highly leveraged infrastructure, asset-manager, and other financial businesses are declared ungradable rather than forced into a numeric score.